In a move that has intrigued the cryptocurrency community, an unidentified individual transferred 26.9 BTC, approximately valued at $1.19 million, into the Genesis wallet, the first wallet created on the Bitcoin network by the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto. This transaction, which took place on January 5 at 1.52 AM ET, coincided with the 15th anniversary of Bitcoin.
Arkham Intelligence, an on-chain analytics platform, reported that the mysterious wallet had been funded through complex transactions involving various addresses before this significant transfer. Intriguingly, most of these funds were traced back to a wallet believed to be owned by the cryptocurrency exchange Binance. The sender withdrew nearly 27 BTC from Binance just before transferring it to Nakamoto’s wallet, with only these two transactions recorded in the wallet’s activity log.
The transfer to the Genesis wallet, which is impossible to retrieve, has led to speculation. Given that crypto exchanges like Binance are required to adhere to stringent Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures, it’s possible that the identity of the sender is known to Binance’s compliance team.
Conor Grogan, a director at Coinbase, humorously reacted to the news, suggesting the possibilities of either Satoshi Nakamoto awakening to buy and transfer the BTC or someone having burned a million dollars in a whimsical act.
The Genesis wallet, a creation of Bitcoin’s mysterious inventor, has mostly accumulated trivial transactions since January 3, 2009. While Nakamoto could theoretically access these funds, it is widely believed to be highly improbable, especially given that funds from Nakamoto-associated wallets haven’t been moved since his disappearance in December 2010.
Originally holding 50 BTC when Nakamoto vanished, the Genesis wallet’s balance had grown to 72 BTC by the end of 2023. This latest transaction boosts its balance to about 99.68 BTC, or roughly $4.3 million at current rates.
This unexpected transaction has spurred various theories within the crypto community. Some view it as a tribute to Bitcoin’s creator, while others consider it a financial mistake or a publicity stunt. Some also speculate it might be an attempt to generate excitement ahead of the potential approval of a spot Bitcoin ETF by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).